Introduction
BREAKING LEGAL DRAMA: Priscilla Presley’s Son Navarone Garcia Pulled Into Explosive $50 Million Lawsuit
The legal storm surrounding Priscilla Presley has just taken a dramatic new turn. Her son, Navarone Garcia, is now being dragged into the ongoing courtroom battle with two former business partners who claim both mother and son benefited from their work but failed to pay what was owed.
At the center of the dispute are plaintiffs Breijit Cruz and Kevin Fialo—self-described entrepreneurs in the Elvis memorabilia and branding world. They allege that they spent years helping Priscilla Presley manage her name, image, and likeness rights, often referred to as NIL. According to them, they invested millions of dollars and countless hours into building her brand, only to be cut out of lucrative deals. Their original complaint accused Priscilla of fraud, breach of contract, and intentional interference, while painting her as a “calculated manipulator” who allegedly misrepresented her ownership of Presley-related rights.
Now, in an amended filing, the plaintiffs extend those accusations to Navarone Garcia. They claim they not only handled business ventures for Priscilla but also negotiated on Garcia’s behalf—including a complex settlement involving the estate of his late half-sister, Lisa Marie Presley. In return, they argue, Garcia reaped seven-figure benefits yet failed to compensate them. Even more, the suit alleges Garcia persuaded his mother to sever ties with Cruz and Fialo altogether, sabotaging businesses they had built around the Presley brand.
The lawsuit doesn’t hold back. Beyond financial grievances, it points to a pattern of alleged manipulation stretching back decades—citing Priscilla’s divorce from Elvis, her later control over Graceland affairs, and even sensational claims about Lisa Marie’s final days. Plaintiffs argue this latest case is part of a broader narrative: that Priscilla, with Garcia’s involvement, exploited those closest to her for power and money.
For Garcia, the accusations include “interference with contractual relations” and failure to pay for “goods and services rendered.” Legal analysts note that proving such interference will hinge on written communications, contracts, and testimony—evidence that has yet to surface.
As the case unfolds, Priscilla’s legal team is expected to fight vigorously, possibly moving to dismiss or seek summary judgment before trial. But one thing is clear: by pulling Garcia into the spotlight, Cruz and Fialo may be turning up the pressure not only in court, but in the court of public opinion.